Thursday, January 19, 2012

Thomas Worth, Forgotten Comic Artist












THOMAS WORTH, FORGOTTEN COMIC ARTIST

By E.M. Sanchez-Saavedra

One of America’s most prolific nineteenth-century comic illustrators, whose drawings once adorned the walls of homes, apartments, saloons and the covers of magazines and dime novels, is nearly forgotten today. The career of Thomas Worth (1834-1917) spanned the period from the elaborate hand-pulled lithographs of Currier and Ives to the mass-produced magazines of the twentieth century. Despite his long life, very little biographical information has survived beyond the huge corpus of his illustrations.

According to Harry T. Peters in Currier and Ives -- Printmakers to the American People (New York: Doubleday, Doran & Co., 1942), Thomas Worth was born in Greenwich Village, NYC and began to draw when he was a child. When he was in his late ‘teens, he submitted a sketch to the lithographers Currier and Ives. Nathaniel Currier looked at the humorous scene of two boys driving an ash wagon and said, “This is a clever thing. We’ll give you five dollars for it just as it is.” Although never a regular staff member, Currier and Ives considered him one of their major contributors. Over the years hundreds of his drawings were redrawn on stone and published as individual lithographs and sets. An avid sportsman and fisherman, Worth produced many prints of trotting horses and outdoor scenes. He is best known for several long series of comics: “Railway Incidents,” the “Howling Swell” series and seventy-five “Darktown” prints. These last represent what Stephen J. Gertz has termed “the dark side of Currier and Ives” (pun obviously intended).

Unlike the often-saccharine mush and wallowing nostalgic subjects now associated with the lithographers, the Darktown prints were a celebration of the worst racial stereotypes current in the nineteenth century. They were also among the firm’s largest sellers – one print sold 73,000 copies! Worth’s drawings were augmented by those of James Cameron (1829-1862) a young Scottish immigrant.

Although most Americans after about 1860 got their dose of “the funnies” from comic magazines, newspapers and almanacs, Currier and Ives’ huge output of political and social “comics” drew upon a much older tradition of elaborate satirical cartoons and caricatures, dating back to the late seventeenth century. Prints by the brilliant English artists William Hogarth, James Gillray, Thomas Rowlandson, the Cruikshank brothers and others represent the finest works of this class – meticulously hand colored large copperplate prints. The technique of lithography, involving drawing on flat stone blocks with crayons, rather than hand-incising millions of minute lines into a copper plate or woodblock, reduced the expense and time required to turn an artist’s drawing into a finished print. Currier and Ives employed the process to mass-produce affordable art for anyone who wanted to brighten up a drab room. The ephemeral political cartoons were meant to be purchased, examined, discussed -- and ultimately discarded.

Thomas Worth bridged the two traditions and contributed to a wide variety of venues. Shortly after selling his first drawing to Mr. Currier, he took a bundle of sketches to Harper and Brothers. Charles Parsons, head of Harper’s art department, liked what he saw and Worth’s work would appear in the firm’s many publications for decades. The iconic masthead of Harper’s Weekly A Journal of Civilization is signed with the monogram “TW,” and might possibly be a Worth design.

In the 1880s and ‘90s, Thomas Worth’s signed drawings began to appear in the Frank Tousey story papers and later nickel weeklies. Older designs made the transition from black-and-white formats to the new colored covers after 1898, when Tousey “modernized” the appearance of his weeklies. Many engravings in Tousey papers were anonymous, but Worth’s stature was a definite asset and his full signature or initials appear on his illustrations.

According to Harry Peters, who knew Worth personally, “He liked good company and had an impressive capacity for liquor.” He and his wife Louise S. Worth are buried in East Islip, New York.































See also HERE

6 comments:

  1. Excellent article. These types of cartoons are largely forgotten in America in favor of interest in their British predecessors, so I really enjoyed seeing this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Mike. I have 2 of Worth's prints. They were my Fathers. I have "De Fust Blood" and "De Fust Knock Down." I am 65 yrs old and these where hanging in my Dad's office when I was young. Any idea of their worth? It would be interesting. Its an art era that is gone forever.
      Britt Price

      Delete
  2. This was one of my ancestors, nice to finally see more information about him. Very interests, thanks much.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Outstanding article!

    I could not find a listing on the Wikipedia for Worth, but may have overlooked it. A very talented artist. Thanks for preserving history.

    I did a project on Worth's Darktown series but did not know about his other work.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great article and only came across due to researching the history of a picture I recently purchased at estate sale. Came across a painting dated 1869 and signature which the seller thought said “the North”. Writing on bottom “Timothy Smith in his wagon 1869. After extensive research found the signature to be of Thomas Worth. I believe the painting to be one of a kind and being Worth lived in islip Iong Island he may have had connections to Smith family of Smithtown. Friends? Timothy C Smith passed in 1877 and the house he lived in is known as the Timothy house. ( google it) the painting depicts Worths work, horse, carriage and even a little bit of humor in it. Any additional information on Worth and relationship to Smith family (Smithtown) would be welcomed.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I recently purchased a signed print by Thomas Worth entiltled A Smoking Run,supposedly a NJ print about the Essex Hunt in NJ. I am interested in finding out the significance of this print.I assume it was political Satire but what is its meaning ?

    ReplyDelete